“To a Walnut Dask”, Part II, The Writing Compartment.

open

Writing compartment of the desk attributed to John Head. Made in Philadelphia, 1720-1740. Black walnut, hard pine, Atlantic white cedar, yellow poplar, brass, iron. Private collection.

For a lack of other surviving desks that can be attributed to John Head’s shop, we have no way of knowing if the writing compartment is typical of his work.  More or less elaborate interiors may account for some part of the range of prices Head charged for desks.

Along the back at the center of the writing compartment are five divided openings over three drawers.  In front of the drawers is a board that slides towards the back revealing another storage space commonly called a well.  Wells were a common device seen on desks in the first decades of the eighteenth century, but by the late 1730s, they were were on their way out of favor, replaced by an additional drawer above the long drawers of the desk that could only be accessed when the fall was closed.  The desk is “winged”, a term found in Prices of Cabinet and Chair Work, Philadelphia, 1772 which refers to the fact the pair of drawers on the sides of the writing compartment have “flown” past the central bank of drawers, creating framing for longer drawers that could fit documents and writing implements that the shorter drawers at the center could not accommodate.

IMG_2662

The fronts of the “wing” dividers are double-arch moulded, the other dividers are single-arched.

IMG_2753.adj

A filet and cove motif reoccurs everywhere on the desk, as it does in all Head’s designs for furniture. The wings are a large version of this motif and here, on the valences along the top of the writing compartment, Head created a miniature version.

interior drawer.adj

The drawers in the writing compartment utilize Head’s system of drawer part identification.

IMG_2750

The drawer fronts have saw kerfs that extend past the gauge lines as we’ve come to expect in drawers made in Head’s shop, but, like the long drawers of the desk, they are not as long as other examples we’ve seen.  We know that Head had apprentices and it’s operations such as this technical example of sawing, which Head had no reason to control or compel an apprentice or journeyman to do differently and which had no effect on the outward appearance of an object, where we can observe the work of different hands.

bottom.adj

 Ink spills and ink stains are found in a majority of historic desks.   A large swath of the bottom of this drawer is stained with a dark ink.  Head constructed the small drawers of the writing compartment in a different manner than the large, long drawers.  The bottom board is fit to rebates in the sides and back as well as the fronts.  A user of the desk would work more intimately with these drawers, view them more closely and when working, might remove them and sit them on the writing surface for easy access to their contents.  The rebated bottom makes for a neater appearance, with no edge or end grain of the bottom visible. Notice that the bottom corners where the sides and back meet are mitered.  In this case, it is not decorative or for neatness of appearance – the top corners are not mitered – but an efficient way to deal with dovetailing boards that are rebated.

Owners of desks, their family members, and others conversant with desk construction in general would have been acquainted with the structure and use of wells, even without the presence of a finger pull carved in the well lid that would suggest the board was meant to move.  (To open the well lid you must apply light pressure with you hand on the top surface and begin pushing it towards the back, once open far enough you can push on the edge of the board to open it fully.) But only those with intimate knowledge of this desk would have known of its hidden compartment.  The two sections of double arch moulding framing the sides of the well lid appear to be glued and/or nailed to the framing members of the writing compartment as, indeed, the moulding at the front of the well is.  But they are not fastened, and when they are carefully removed, a narrow drawer below the center row of drawers, its front decoratively moulded, can be slid forward –  a hidden storage space is revealed.

IMG_2659.adj

Looking down at the floor of the writing compartment.  Double-arch moulding surrounds the well.

IMG_2738.adj

But the mouldings at the sides are loose, held in place by the fact they are notched into the moulding below the center drawers.

hidden.adj

When both side mouldings are removed, the hidden drawer can be slid forward.  In this view, the well lid is pushed to the back of the desk.

IMG_2724.adj

In this view the well lid and hidden drawer have been removed.  Alas, not gold coins were found!

IMG_2720.adj

A front corner of the hidden drawer, dovetailed and nailed.

IMG_2718.adj

The nailed on bottom of the hidden drawer.

IMG_2718adj

Scribe lines for nailing the dividing strips in the hidden drawer.  Along with dividing the long, narrow drawer into compartments, the strips add strength to the rather thin bottom board.

IMG_2721

No dovetails at the rear corners of the hidden drawer and the back is split into three segments with the dividing strips continuing to the back of the drawer.  Glue and nails hold this drawer together.

IMG_2725.adj

The under side of the well lid.  There are rebates at the front and sides and two carved finger pulls at the front.

IMG_2726

A chiseled and gouged finger pull.

Next: “To a Walnut Dask”, Part III, Various and Sundry.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on ““To a Walnut Dask”, Part II, The Writing Compartment.

  1. Thank you Chris for this, another interesting look at Head’s desk.

    The five small drawers are indeed neatly constructed; however, the shallow hidden drawer is surprisingly crude by comparison. I suppose it didn’t receive as much finessing as it wouldn’t have seen the same use and therefore, scrutiny as the others, but still.

    Similar hidden drawers in English bureaux, of the same date, are rare and not usually as carefully disguised. I did encounter one similar drawer, but with an elaborate means of releasing and ejecting it which was accomplished with two wooden springs (one above and one behind).

    The spacing of the rather thick drawer divisions/ribs within the hidden drawer is peculiar (given Head’s usual attention to detail): They don’t align with the superjacent drawer divisions nor are the compartments symmetrical, which makes me wonder if they were designed to contain specific contents.

    JP

    • Quite so about the hidden drawer, much more crude. Likely it stayed “hidden” most of the time and was only opened as secrecy permitted. Perhaps the dividers were placed for specific items? There is so much we don’t know. By the way, the front ends of the dividers are toe-nailed into the front of the drawer! I don’t believe they were an after thought as the back would have been in one piece or sew kerfs would be present on the bottom board from cutting the back to fit the dividers.

      There is a strong tradition of hidden drawers in eighteenth century Philadelphia desks and desks and bookcases, with this perhaps being the earliest example I’ve examined in depth.

      Thank you as always for your comments and interest.

      Chris

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s